VAST stage 3 vs. C6 Z06 supercharged on meth injection...
#23
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
622 RWHP on 6 psi stock LS7
587 RWHP on 4.5 psi stock LS7
820 RWHP on 14.5 psi race version on some engine work
Now you tell me what a 3150 lbs car runs with 622 whp. Go drive one then run your mouth about it.
587 RWHP on 4.5 psi stock LS7
820 RWHP on 14.5 psi race version on some engine work
Now you tell me what a 3150 lbs car runs with 622 whp. Go drive one then run your mouth about it.
#26
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
a 10 sec/135 mph car at it. There is a big difference between a rolling race with one at SEA LEVEL compared to one at 4k feet elevation. Go drive one at that altitude.....then get back to me about it and then maybe, just maybe.....i won't run my mouth. LOL
It's very VERY easy to see how a Jerbel car more than kept up with it.....under those conditions (off a launch which gives the S4 a HUGE advantage) and that elevation. Duh.......
It's very VERY easy to see how a Jerbel car more than kept up with it.....under those conditions (off a launch which gives the S4 a HUGE advantage) and that elevation. Duh.......
#27
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
concentration must also decrease. That is why athletes have a harder time at higher altitude, because they must breath in more air in order to take in an equal amount of O2 and oxygenate their muscles.
#29
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
boost up. S/C can't speed up to compensate for altitude since they run a fixed ratio to the crank.
#30
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
All I am saying is that a 93 octane map k04 S4 will not stand a chance against a pro charged Z vette.<ul><li><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/05/10-second-stock-c6-corvette-z06-on-run-flats/">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/12/05/10-second-stock-c6-corvette-z06-on-run-flats/</a</li></ul>