180Q Torques--BIG difference
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Due to remarkable gearing diffs in Q compared to FWD, offer the following:
SHIFT TORQUE UNITY RPMS
---------- -----------------------------------
1>2.............unavailable...6660 = 55 lbs. loss
2>3.............unavailable...6600 = 4.3 lbs. loss
3>4.............~6225
4>5.............moot since 4 & 5 gearing so close
from what I'm seeing, Q seems to have
PEAK TORQUE
1.......3000 RPM
2.......5500-5550 RPM
3.......4700 RPM
4.......4150 RPM
5.......3000 RPM
Guess that's why I like 2nd so much....
SHIFT TORQUE UNITY RPMS
---------- -----------------------------------
1>2.............unavailable...6660 = 55 lbs. loss
2>3.............unavailable...6600 = 4.3 lbs. loss
3>4.............~6225
4>5.............moot since 4 & 5 gearing so close
from what I'm seeing, Q seems to have
PEAK TORQUE
1.......3000 RPM
2.......5500-5550 RPM
3.......4700 RPM
4.......4150 RPM
5.......3000 RPM
Guess that's why I like 2nd so much....
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yes, I know someone posted those ratios without compensating.
Shift points for the 180Q are higher than for the FWD (unless at redline in lower gears) since the gaps between ratios are larger.
Peak torque in each gear is at same rpm's, namely all the way from 1950 to 4700 (according to factory specs). In reality there will be imperfections in that flat curve, but peak torque in each gear must come at same rpm regardless of which gear it is.
Shift points for the 180Q are higher than for the FWD (unless at redline in lower gears) since the gaps between ratios are larger.
Peak torque in each gear is at same rpm's, namely all the way from 1950 to 4700 (according to factory specs). In reality there will be imperfections in that flat curve, but peak torque in each gear must come at same rpm regardless of which gear it is.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Torsen1
S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
9
10-12-2002 09:21 AM
Jim TT
TT (Mk1) Discussion
33
04-23-2002 06:25 PM