TT (Mk1) Discussion Discussion forum for the Mk1 Audi TT Coupe & Roadster produced from 2000-2006

Audi TTQ Roadster vs. Boxster S in latest Motor Trend

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-25-2000, 03:18 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Rawhide Rosenwad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Audi TTQ Roadster vs. Boxster S in latest Motor Trend

I guess I was the first to get mine this month.

Of course the Boxster S blows it away in the straight line accelerations tests. I'll just paraphrases them and not give all details:

0-60: 5.3 sec., Boxster S to 6.4 sec., Audi
Quarter mile: 13.9 (impressive), Boxster S to 14.9, Audi

Skidpad: 0.98, Boxster S (wow) to 0.89, Audi

Slalom mph were surprisingly close: 70.2, Boxster to 69.3, Audi.

There is a really intersting discussion on how to get the most out of the Audi in the corners.

MT prefers the TT for the price. The Boxster S is pretty much performing in near 'Vette territory.

I guess this is another comparo for the twelve and thirteen-year-olds to debate in the newsgroups... I'm staying out of it.

Pick up the newest MT and add it to the TT review collection.<p>-EJS, 2001 225TTC, Silver/Black
Old 07-25-2000, 03:28 PM
  #2  
New Member
 
treminga@execpc.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Thanks, pretty much made my next decision :-)

Thanks, I asked the forum before for info on the Boxster S, and now I think the decision is down to 2. Out of these cars.... Audi 225 Roadster, Honda S2000, Porsche Boxster S, Porsche 911 Carrera (a little lofty in price, but AMAZING POWER!), M Roadster, and that SLK. This artical helped out a lot. It has not been dropped to the 911 vs. the boxster, and it is a close race. The 911 will hold its value a little better then the Boxster S, but the Boxster S obviously costs less.

Back to the books :-)
Thanks for the artical,<p>Thanks,
Tom Reminga
HACK THS
<img src="http://pictureposter.audiworld.com/AudiWorldPics/2000/hackths.jpg">
Old 07-25-2000, 04:16 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
gdewiTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Why on Earth do they insist on comparing cars so far apart in price?

It just makes no sense to me. The Boxster S wasn't even in the running for me because I would have had to spend in the high fifties vs. high thirties. If I had the extra $20K I would be driving the Porsche right now. But in my price bracket the only comparable cars are Honda S2000 and BMW Z3 2.3. Easy decision. ;-)
Old 07-26-2000, 04:23 AM
  #4  
AudiWorld Member
 
encierro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Get the 911 if you are getting a Porsche.

The boxster is know as the cheap man's porsche. Although I like it too, you mise well go all out and go for the master of all cars the 911.
Old 07-26-2000, 07:33 AM
  #5  
Member
 
CarTTman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 3,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Agreed - if you're gonna compare cars with a $20k diff. - why not a $38k 225C vs a Hyundai Tiburon!!

<p><img src="http://utenti.tripod.it/~the_simpsons_family/bart/bart5.gif" border="0">
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jason Teller
Audi News Forum
1
02-23-2008 04:26 AM
Jason Teller
Audi News Forum
0
07-02-2007 09:43 PM
TT4K9S
TT (Mk1) Discussion
5
07-10-2002 11:08 PM
SoloTTech
TT (Mk1) Discussion
28
08-24-2001 04:04 PM
Brad Willis
TT (Mk1) Discussion
5
01-19-2000 02:29 PM



Quick Reply: Audi TTQ Roadster vs. Boxster S in latest Motor Trend



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:31 AM.