TT (Mk1) Discussion Discussion forum for the Mk1 Audi TT Coupe & Roadster produced from 2000-2006

Are Brembo drilled rotors good?...>>>

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-24-2005, 01:54 PM
  #11  
AudiWorld Uber User
 
TTschwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 53,281
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Mintex red box are pretty low dust....>

I ran them for 20K or so...

get em here:<ul><li><a href="http://www.ttstuff.com">http://www.ttstuff.com</a</li></ul>
Old 01-24-2005, 02:00 PM
  #12  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Sully's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Slotted it is then. Less money than Power slot rotors.>>

About a $300 bill. How easy to install?
Old 01-24-2005, 02:22 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
TTagz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default we used to cross drill our own rotors when I helped circle track guys...

as long as they were countersunk, they never cracked. Cross drilled rotors will run much cooler than slotted rotors will. If it is a quality rotor, I doubt you'd crack them. If you did, the company should replace them.
Old 01-24-2005, 02:27 PM
  #14  
AudiWorld Super User
 
msauve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Holes and slots can BOTH cause stress points, leading to...

cracks.

The _theory_ is they let gas escape for better braking. I've never seen a scientific test showing performance.

But if that's the case, WHY NOT JUST SLOT THE PADS? Duh. Some of them even come that way. It's not like it would make a difference which is slotted, the pads and rotor are moving relative to each other. One can picture the gas "sticking" to the pad and being release when a rotor slot comes by, OR the gas "sticking" to the rotor and being released when the slot in the pad comes by - no difference.

Do you seriously think the mass from drilling a few dozen holes makes a difference? Have you ever picked up a disc? I'd bet there's not a whit of difference between the mass removed from drilling vs. slotting and that there's more manufacturing variation between different discs than that caused by either.
Old 01-24-2005, 02:37 PM
  #15  
AudiWorld Super User
 
JohnLZ7W's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 21,113
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Drilled does look quite cool, I think I will miss them a bit

cross-drilled zimmermanns front rotors
<img src="http://lz7w.com/albums/zimm/IMG_3263.sized.jpg">

drilled and slotted big ECS rear rotors
<img src="http://lz7w.com/albums/ecsrear/IMG_1332.jpg">
Old 01-24-2005, 03:04 PM
  #16  
Member
 
garreTTk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I bet if you put them on a scale, there would be a significant difference....

I've not picked up slotted vs drilled for the same car. But slotted M Coupe vs Drilled TT , the drilled weighed less. And I know that's not a fair comparison.

I've had pads that had a single slot down the center (up-down) and found that it tended to fill up with dust instead of relasing it. I'm not sure why, but think it may have worked better if angled.

The most likely stress points on the slotted rotors are at the edges of the disc (center and outter) where stress points for the drilled occur at each drilled location.

I speak only from my experience and from the little bit of materials engineering I remember, but I believ that drilled rotors on the track, without an adequate cooling system, is trouble waiting.
Old 01-24-2005, 03:06 PM
  #17  
Member
 
garreTTk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Zimmerman did step up and replace them, but I've talked to others at the track...

with similar experiences.

Like I've said - just my experience and little bit of materials engineering I recall from school.
Old 01-24-2005, 03:21 PM
  #18  
AudiWorld Super User
 
msauve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Define "significant..."

<center><img src="http://www.drivewerks.com/catalog/Performance/cross-rotor.gif"></center><p>
Quick calc. TT front discs are 312mm dia.

3.14 x (312/2)^2 = 76500 mm^2

Let's say 36 holes, each 5 mm in diameter = 36 x 3.14 x (5/2)^2 = 700 mm^2

So, that's about 1%, assuming a full diameter flat disc. Of course, the holes are drilled in the swept area, and there's the center which is thinner, but that center is also a significant heat sink, since it conducts heat to the hub.

So, a reasonable calculation is that cross drilled rotors remove around 1% of the mass, and likely less than 1% of the thermal mass.

I'll bet unit to unit mass varies considerably more than 1% for these castings.

And if the pad slot is filled with dust, there's not much gas blowing through there, is there?

edit:fixed math
Old 01-24-2005, 03:28 PM
  #19  
Member
 
garreTTk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default No new toys to brag about - except for the boat.

It's just been too damn cold to have any fun on it lately. I've been doing a fair amount of work to upgrade things, but am trying to restrain the expenditures on it. Trying it the key word.

Still toying with the idea of picking up a used TT and playing with it, but need to finish getting Julie through school so we have some real fun money. I'm not a good sugar daddy.

Has Brad got the short bus running yet? I know he was getting close.
Old 01-24-2005, 04:07 PM
  #20  
Member
 
garreTTk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I can admit being wrong. :-) But I still contend they crack eaisier than slotted.

But we all know about opinions......


Quick Reply: Are Brembo drilled rotors good?...>>>



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:06 AM.