AudiWorld Forums

TT (Mk1) Discussion Discussion forum for the Mk1 Audi TT Coupe & Roadster produced from 2000-2006

Dyno day done, just got back, as promised, RESULTS!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-07-2005, 09:22 PM
  #21  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
ARC Studios's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Don't forget, that's combined with 55 FT-BLS of Torque!
ARC Studios is offline  
Reply Like
Old 01-07-2005, 09:40 PM
  #22  
AudiWorld Super User
 
That damn Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
So are you going into production with these.and if yes. are you going to offer both diameters?
That damn Dan is offline  
Reply Like
Old 01-07-2005, 09:43 PM
  #23  
AudiWorld Super User
 
MaxHedrm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
Posts: 7,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Also keep in mind that the stock car wasn't his. (Was it even the same day?)
There can be a lot of variance from one TT to the next, manufacturing tolerances & all. That one may have been a bit strong & his may have been a bit weak to start with. & I'm sure running lean doesn't help so much.
MaxHedrm is offline  
Reply Like
Old 01-08-2005, 04:15 AM
  #24  
AudiWorld Uber User
 
TTschwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 53,281
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default By "stock car" do you mean..>>
One with an equivalent chip, no other mods?
Does the 30hp gain include the chip? I would expect that to net out 30 on it's own...Please clarify Todd..
TTschwing is offline  
Reply Like
Old 01-08-2005, 04:47 AM
  #25  
Member
 
petervan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
Nice..agree on cat and the importance of +55lbft. good results from a K04
petervan is offline  
Reply Like
Old 01-08-2005, 04:56 AM
  #26  
Member
 
petervan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
if the +30hp was due only to the bolt on intake stuff...I'll get a BAMM asap!
petervan is offline  
Reply Like
Old 01-08-2005, 05:09 AM
  #27  
Member
 
petervan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Think I have 2.5"...years of experience in Europe with this set up and they haven't gone 3".>
conclusion seems to be the 2.5" is better suited for even a bigger turbo.
petervan is offline  
Reply Like
Old 01-08-2005, 05:14 AM
  #28  
Member
 
petervan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
wait..read again..no chip added..so, what mods =+hp&torque?..down pipes with stock ECU mapping?
petervan is offline  
Reply Like
Old 01-08-2005, 05:31 AM
  #29  
Member
 
petervan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default
agree..the 175stock could have been ~181, etc...still.significant improvement only not sure how much
petervan is offline  
Reply Like
Old 01-08-2005, 06:53 AM
  #30  
Member
 
hAUDIni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default As a few others have asked, was the stock car STOCK or chipped too?
And if it was chipped, did all 3 cars run the same chip/program?
hAUDIni is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: Dyno day done, just got back, as promised, RESULTS!


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:02 PM.