Honda and TT... which is faster?
02-14-2001, 10:28 AM
#12
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Then I think you need to trade the TT in and get a Honda......
But seriously, what's the big deal about being
faster then a Honda. A Honda is a Honda is a
Honda....bland, noisy, peaky, teeth chattering
vibration, etc. The TT is a much more civil car
that is a whole package. It was never produced
to be a drag racer or look good with a huge
rear muffler. Drive it and enjoy the looks,
style, and feel. Much better then any Honda,
and yes, I have owned a few of them.
faster then a Honda. A Honda is a Honda is a
Honda....bland, noisy, peaky, teeth chattering
vibration, etc. The TT is a much more civil car
that is a whole package. It was never produced
to be a drag racer or look good with a huge
rear muffler. Drive it and enjoy the looks,
style, and feel. Much better then any Honda,
and yes, I have owned a few of them.
02-14-2001, 10:31 AM
#14
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!! I AM NOT BUYING A CAR!!!
stop offering me cars. I already have TT which i can not stand not to drive for more than 2 days.
Its just a technical question (which i may have worded wrongly).
1/ for a car such as prelude which has more HP than 180 TT, why is it slower?
also, when you chip it, it gives your more torque - 70+, than why doesn't horse power increase that much? i thought it was constant x torque x rpm.
thanks for input.
Its just a technical question (which i may have worded wrongly).
1/ for a car such as prelude which has more HP than 180 TT, why is it slower?
also, when you chip it, it gives your more torque - 70+, than why doesn't horse power increase that much? i thought it was constant x torque x rpm.
thanks for input.
