TT (Mk1) Discussion Discussion forum for the Mk1 Audi TT Coupe & Roadster produced from 2000-2006

How many megapixels does one REALLY need? 5? More? Less?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2002, 11:05 AM
  #21  
Member
 
The Pope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Actually . . . .

slide film (e-6 process) has no grain . . . but it does have a diglobular structure (during processing grain is "converted" to dyes).

Guess my 8x10 films = roughly 266.6666somthing megapixels which should be just about enough resolution.
Old 05-31-2002, 11:06 AM
  #22  
Elder Member
 
Rennen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 13,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Agreed, but you have to agree that the analog resolution of quality film is difficult to...

...mimick in a consumer grade digital camera....at least for the time being.
Old 05-31-2002, 11:07 AM
  #23  
AudiWorld Expert
 
dloftis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 29,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default My feelings on the F707 >>>

The optics are wonderful, the circuitry is pretty good. Extremely user friendly. The Zeiss optics were a major selling point for me.

Other factors that I really liked:
-It feels like an SLR. I can hold it correctly. It doesn't feel like a $10 Wal-Mart point and shoot.
-It has provisions for external flash. IMHO, built in flashes are crap for MOST uses.
-Decent optical zoom

Things I really DISLIKE:
-Zoom could have been a lot longer in the size of the thing
-Viewfinder is a bit small. Also, I prefer the digital viewfinder over a cheap rangefinder, but it's hard to get used to--- especially if you're used to TTL features like an SLR. A good rangefinder would have been more useful, but less popular.
-Not crazy about the proprietary media format. Would have loved a CF slot to put a microdrive in.
-No RAW or TIFF format. It only does JPG.
-The zoom controls are on the left side at the front of the lens. While convenient for two hand shooting, it's a pain in the *** if you want to hold the camera and shoot with one hand (which is otherwise VERY easy to do.)
Old 05-31-2002, 11:08 AM
  #24  
AudiWorld Expert
 
dloftis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 29,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My point was that film isn't infinite resolution... that's all
Old 05-31-2002, 11:08 AM
  #25  
AudiWorld Expert
 
dloftis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 29,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Heh, I seriously considered the D60... decided against it because >>

I didn't fell that my skill level really justified that kind of equipment.
Old 05-31-2002, 11:10 AM
  #26  
Wiz
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
Wiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default And I wanted to take pictures, not to become an artist :)

That's why it suits me perfectly
Old 05-31-2002, 11:19 AM
  #27  
Elder Member
 
nansaidh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 11,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ahhh memories.... my first "real" camera was an A1 <fond smiles>
Old 05-31-2002, 11:20 AM
  #28  
Member
 
The Pope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default No its not, however . . .

you should keep in mind that with a good film (hi resolution) the limiting factor is NOT the film at all, but the lens.

End use is an often neglected parameter, but thats another book in itself.

Genisis 1:2

(and the Lord said, Let there be light . . . and it was good!)
Old 05-31-2002, 11:21 AM
  #29  
AudiWorld Expert
 
dloftis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 29,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default That's what I learned on originally >>>

My ONLY 35 right now is a Nikkormat. The meter sucks, but it's a pretty good camera... you just have to know how to use one without "program"
Old 05-31-2002, 11:22 AM
  #30  
AudiWorld Expert
 
dloftis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 29,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I understand that <more>

In the bottom of <a href="https://forums.audiworld.com/tt/msgs/584543.phtml">this</A> message, I said:

"Another thought: while film may be closer to 20 MP, your average consumer camera have such ****ty optics that the film could be MUCH worse and still look just as good. Optics matter, a lot!"


Quick Reply: How many megapixels does one REALLY need? 5? More? Less?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:19 AM.