TT (Mk1) Discussion Discussion forum for the Mk1 Audi TT Coupe & Roadster produced from 2000-2006

how much weight savings by removing these items?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2008, 01:42 PM
  #31  
AudiWorld Super User
 
|everso!|'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Brooklyn NYC
Posts: 11,103
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default agreed. i see no reason to save a couple pounds and...

take the risk of damaging stuff on the underside.
Old 03-06-2008, 01:42 PM
  #32  
AudiWorld Super User
 
|everso!|'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Brooklyn NYC
Posts: 11,103
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default you might as well just glue some wheels to your hip and

ROLL into town with no car. hell, stick an Audi badge on your chest maaan!
Old 03-06-2008, 02:02 PM
  #33  
Member
 
sandra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Had to stifle a loud laugh at "go to subway", I'm still at work. >:-)
Old 03-06-2008, 02:39 PM
  #34  
New Member
 
diTTmar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default APR $2k installed K04 Turbo will get you above a stock 225. Keep...

all the parts on your car. If you do the K04, then you might be pushing 245 hp with all your other goodies on. That should be pretty nice for a FWD TT being a few hundred pounds lighter than a quattro. Probably just a teensie bit lower in accelation than a slightly modded 225 at 265HP

Comparison below
http://www.web-cars.com/math/accel1.pl<ul><li><a href="http://www.web-cars.com/math/accel1.pl">http://www.web-cars.com/math/accel1.pl</a</li></ul>
Old 03-06-2008, 03:07 PM
  #35  
AudiWorld Super User
 
MaxHedrm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
Posts: 7,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default It's not a skid plate.

*sigh*

The only thing that piece of plastic deflects is air &amp; water. That said, removing it is a bad idea if you ever drive @ speeds over around 40mph for aerodynamic reasons.
Old 03-06-2008, 03:09 PM
  #36  
AudiWorld Super User
 
JohnLZ7W's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 21,113
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

40mph or 140mph?
Old 03-06-2008, 03:15 PM
  #37  
Junior Member
 
mad scientist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default nice...

<center><img src="http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i311/tucsontim/16121lr.jpg"></center><p>
The quarter mile acceleration time of a car that weighs 1400 pounds and has 120 horsepower is 13.211 seconds.


Faster than my TT! (once I get the engine back in)
Old 03-06-2008, 03:16 PM
  #38  
Member
 
blueprinTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,761
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Could just hire an 85 lb. jockey to drive your car! ;-) ..without you in it , of course.
Old 03-06-2008, 03:18 PM
  #39  
AudiWorld Super User
 
MaxHedrm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
Posts: 7,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 40. Aerodynamics start to mess with things around 40 or 50.

That particular piece of plastic probably has more impact on gas mileage at those speeds than downforce, but it is still an impact.
Old 03-06-2008, 05:03 PM
  #40  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
sonus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LOL


Quick Reply: how much weight savings by removing these items?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:35 PM.