TT (Mk1) Discussion Discussion forum for the Mk1 Audi TT Coupe & Roadster produced from 2000-2006

Repost: Some impartial airbox testing, Thanks Wak!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2006, 04:54 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
02TTK04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Repost: Some impartial airbox testing, Thanks Wak!

I know it is a repost, but has some good information.<ul><li><a href="http://www.wak-tt.com/mods/inductiontests/inductiontests.htm">http://www.wak-tt.com/mods/inductiontests/inductiontests.htm</a></li></ul>
Old 06-01-2006, 05:38 AM
  #2  
AudiWorld Super User
 
maaliish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I'd like to see that test on a hot summer day after sitting in traffic for 15 minutes.

Results make sense...neuspeed seems to have a rather large surface area without any obstructions to the flow, but on a hot day results may have proved to be different. Not bashing the test it self...its great and I wish more people would do this type of thing, just curious of the outcome under different circumstances.
Old 06-01-2006, 05:42 AM
  #3  
Member
 
AxeYrCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 15,536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Interesting. I'd like to see more about air temps as well.

I also found it odd that in the final graph, the VTDA seems to have performed much better at lower RPM than the Neuspeed intake...


IMO, it makes sense that a more restrictive intake would give you a little more on the bottom end and take a little more from the top on a turbo'd car. (Which I think accounts for the numbers from the stock intake.)
Old 06-01-2006, 06:12 AM
  #4  
AudiWorld Uber User
 
TTschwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 53,281
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default The only problem with those results..>>

are that Torque (and the HP number manually calculated from it) is grossly innacurate. It's known that, particularly on a chipped car, this number is off and purely an internal calculation to start with. A VAG output is not accurate. If it was correct we wouldn't need dynos now would we?! Flow is more closely linked to HP. No surprise that the P-Flow sucks more at higher RPM's. No restrictive casing at all to contend with......Just heat and noise. The airbox WAK uses on his own car? VTDA, Natch....:-)

BTW I'll have a befor and after actual dyno on a 3.2 after this weekend...
Old 06-01-2006, 06:14 AM
  #5  
Member
 
AxeYrCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 15,536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tee hee.
Old 06-01-2006, 06:39 AM
  #6  
AudiWorld Super User
 
RoberTT-WWCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,091
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Of course...:-)
Old 06-01-2006, 06:42 AM
  #7  
AudiWorld Super User
 
joe@vwvortex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 13,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Under your scenario - what good is extra HP if your just sitting in traffic? :-)
Old 06-01-2006, 06:48 AM
  #8  
AudiWorld Member
 
JuanValdez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I'll be interested in the 3.2 results...

even better if *somebody* then did a before/after with a decent chip.
Old 06-01-2006, 07:18 AM
  #9  
AudiWorld Super User
 
adminisTerTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default drivability

i'm not maaliish, but i hate it when my car is heat soaked and timing and boost are pulled. makes the car a slug and a pain to drive in lots of traffic when it feels like it's tripping all over itself.
Old 06-01-2006, 08:48 AM
  #10  
AudiWorld Super User
 
maaliish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

same here. As soon as I run the feeds, it feels soooo much better.


Quick Reply: Repost: Some impartial airbox testing, Thanks Wak!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:29 PM.