Took a 225QC TT overnite... =))) First experience...
05-17-2006, 10:43 AM
#25
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Which part you didnt get? I think you just too jealous about the last pic... ;) lol
I'm planning to buy a TT. BTW, its not going to be the 75k mi one i was driving. It will be a 2002 and up. Most likelly 2003-'04.
05-17-2006, 10:46 AM
#26
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BTW,im not going to buy that 75k mi 01.What are all the diferences between a regular 225QC vs. ALMS?
Imma go thru the archives tho. Im sure its there. In your opinion, if i have the money, should i go for it?
05-17-2006, 11:18 AM
#28
AudiWorld Super User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
was that before or after chip? Either way...dude probably didn't know how to drive.
They run 14 seconds in the 1/4 with just intake and exhaust. Stock they run low 14s with a good driver.
05-17-2006, 11:23 AM
#30
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thats what im talking bout. Official statistics for the type-S is 6.9s, i believe...
Motorweek roadtest showed:
Type-S: 6.9s, 15.4 @ 94mph.
And almost same for a...
TT 225Q Roadster: 7.0s, 15.4 @ 94mph. Coupes, as far as i know are a little quicker...
Other magazines had 7.3s for the Type-S! I just dont believe he would blow me away.
Type-S: 6.9s, 15.4 @ 94mph.
And almost same for a...
TT 225Q Roadster: 7.0s, 15.4 @ 94mph. Coupes, as far as i know are a little quicker...
Other magazines had 7.3s for the Type-S! I just dont believe he would blow me away.