Update on dianostic charge for bad Maf. Stealer said I was charged because I had two codes only Maf-
06-06-2006, 02:58 PM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Update on dianostic charge for bad Maf. Stealer said I was charged because I had two codes only Maf-
was warrantied. The second was for secondary air flow. They found a slow leak in the Combi-valve diaphram. So they refused to rebate the charge.
06-06-2006, 03:19 PM
#4
AudiWorld Super User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Talk to the Service Manager.
The diagnostic revealed the bad maf... the maf is a warranty item.
Did you approve the repair to the Kombi Valve? It's usually a busted vac hose that causes a code. The maf probably caused a check engine light.
It's likely that the Kombi valve leak might have caused a code, but not triggered a cel. If that's the case, they shouldn't be charging you simply because they saw the fault code when they scanned the car.
Did you approve the repair to the Kombi Valve? It's usually a busted vac hose that causes a code. The maf probably caused a check engine light.
It's likely that the Kombi valve leak might have caused a code, but not triggered a cel. If that's the case, they shouldn't be charging you simply because they saw the fault code when they scanned the car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pattersom
S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
3
08-04-2006 09:10 AM
aviattor.3
TT (Mk1) Discussion
11
05-25-2006 10:29 PM
TT-Hombre
TT (Mk1) Discussion
13
02-01-2005 04:31 AM
SlowestS4Here
S4 / RS4 (B5 Platform) Discussion
10
11-06-2002 04:54 AM