meem

hmm, this is becoming more and more tempting: seems i can get the wheel with a stepped lip, and a staggered look (1.75" front step, 2.25" rear step) while preserving 19x8.5 all around.

here's a shot of the stepped-lip design:

<img src="http://www.gmpperformance.com/CFJFiles/GMP/5750.jpg">

ZGTT

Nice rims, need adapters?

TT_Nuge

Obviously the LM's are a step above which is why you are comparing them to the CH's. But I also like the RS4's you ran last year for winter and other than the lip I like the look of the RS4's over the RH's as well.

1st BBS LM
2nd Tie RH Ran or RS4
3rd BBS CH

meem

check out the updated pic -- still prefer the rs4's?

EvotechTT

like them. I think they are awesome, I was going to get them as well.

MaD MaTTer

Nice

meem

19x8.5ET55 front w/ET30 adapter -&gt; 19x8.5ET25
19x8.5ET43 rear w/ET25 adapter -&gt; 19x8.5ET18

as you know, i'd prefer ET22/ET15 front/rear, but in the winter bringing the wheels in a few mm might not be a bad thing.

TT_Nuge

They look better on a car. I guess my only complaint is that I somehow perceive the spokes to be longer and thinner and detract from the design somehow. When I look at an LM I see the individual spokes and the U shape created between them. But when I look at the RH's I see more of the Y shape of each split spoke instead of the pattern created between them.

But they do look better on the car with the lip and the whole look than the RS4's and deserve 2nd on my list by themselves.

Trent

dirrTTy

The RH's look like wannabe Lm's.

ar design

But they look too much like LMs, but arent as hot.