Well I have always wondered about the proportions of the new 3.2 TT...
03-14-2003, 06:43 PM
#22
Two more pics for you... definitely real cars.
This one looks ok
<img src="https://www.audiworld.com/news/03/020303/tt_32_010.jpg">
This one seems to be a bit long in the nose
<img src="https://www.audiworld.com/news/03/020303/tt_32_011.jpg">
<img src="https://www.audiworld.com/news/03/020303/tt_32_010.jpg">
This one seems to be a bit long in the nose
<img src="https://www.audiworld.com/news/03/020303/tt_32_011.jpg">
.
03-14-2003, 06:56 PM
#27
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i agree...re-tooling wouldnt be done just for a six. if you look at the wheel base in the
picture the six looks shorter. I dont think the the pictures are the same...agree whith the plastic could be stretched...but nothin is sheet metal was changed. just look at the head lights did they change the units, it sure looks like it in the picture but i dout it
03-14-2003, 06:57 PM
#28
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
two different lenses, distortion is different...
notice how they seem to differ at the nose and rear. that is cause by the different lenses. one is flatter the other is warping on the ends. the top looks like it was shot with a 35mm, the bottom most likely was 2 1/4 format.