TT (Mk1) Discussion Discussion forum for the Mk1 Audi TT Coupe & Roadster produced from 2000-2006

What is the consensus on the Evoheatshield phenolic spacer? yay ar nay.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2006, 03:29 PM
  #1  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
rumburak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,583
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What is the consensus on the Evoheatshield phenolic spacer? yay ar nay.
Old 11-19-2006, 03:30 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
XCLR8TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default One of those two for sure

Yay.
Old 11-19-2006, 03:31 PM
  #3  
AudiWorld Uber User
 
TTschwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 53,281
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Of course it's a yay.....>>

20% reduction in heat at the manifold. Less heat = more timing = more power
Old 11-19-2006, 03:33 PM
  #4  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
rumburak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,583
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default So those are not the ones that used to melt. >>

I can't remember what brand and material it was but I saw Jeff's old Heatshield melted up to intake manifold. That was not pretty.
Old 11-19-2006, 03:35 PM
  #5  
AudiWorld Super User
 
JustJeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 21,754
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

mine didn't melt, but it was deformed. I went phenolic.
Old 11-19-2006, 03:36 PM
  #6  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
rumburak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,583
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That's what it was. It's been awhile.
Old 11-19-2006, 03:56 PM
  #7  
AudiWorld Uber User
 
TTschwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 53,281
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The Phenolic (Evoshield) won't melt.....You're thinking of the "powergasket"
Old 11-19-2006, 04:09 PM
  #8  
AudiWorld Super User
Thread Starter
 
rumburak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,583
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks for the clarification.
Old 11-19-2006, 05:07 PM
  #9  
AudiWorld Super User
 
GorTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,195
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default fwiw seems like my reductions are even greater >

there must be a significant difference in engine heat between 180's and 225 - TransporTT's bay was wildly hot for instance - (too much so, for a 'regular' drive, but that's the only 225 I've got to compare with - other than oil temps posted on the forum); his mani was far to hot to touch afterward, so I'd say that's your 20%, a good reduction (mani temp of what, say 175 -180?). Mine on the other hand can actually be touched - warm/hot, but won't burn you - after a full drive (oil temp to 220), so much more than 20% (maybe on the order of 140F; a 40% percent reduction - is that possible?). Need to get a spot temp reader on it sometime.
Old 11-19-2006, 05:37 PM
  #10  
AudiWorld Uber User
 
TTschwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 53,281
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Sounds optimistic...>>

Check my actual recorded data....(these are Air temps BTW)<ul><li><a href="http://public.fotki.com/ttschwing/manifold_work/insulating_phenolic/">First 2 charts....here</a></li></ul>


Quick Reply: What is the consensus on the Evoheatshield phenolic spacer? yay ar nay.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:54 PM.