What percentage are you? Performance vs. Aesthetic mods?
#31
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
OSIR fenders = SMIC cooling
caractre grill = ram air
votex chin = aerodynamics improvement
Even the empeg player makes it drive faster (with some music)!
caractre grill = ram air
votex chin = aerodynamics improvement
Even the empeg player makes it drive faster (with some music)!
#33
AudiWorld Super User
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
and while i do search for ways to improve its looks, i feel there is no need to cross boundaries which reduce the aesthetic appeal of the car.
as for performance, I feel there is no real need for me to build a 'monster' performing TT...however to make my daily driver more appealing to get into in the morning does involve improving whatever features of performance and looks in order to do so.
i'd say i'm 30% aesthetics, 70% performance....but neither one is a powerful percentage.
i'm MORE interested in trying to preserve the purity of the car as a design and engineering design. Sure it may be flawed, but it's less flawed than most other cars, IMO.
as for performance, I feel there is no real need for me to build a 'monster' performing TT...however to make my daily driver more appealing to get into in the morning does involve improving whatever features of performance and looks in order to do so.
i'd say i'm 30% aesthetics, 70% performance....but neither one is a powerful percentage.
i'm MORE interested in trying to preserve the purity of the car as a design and engineering design. Sure it may be flawed, but it's less flawed than most other cars, IMO.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SF_VR6
TT (Mk1) Discussion
6
01-30-2001 10:16 AM