APR TUNE
04-20-2010, 07:59 AM
#12
AudiWorld Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Carmel, CA USA
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I haven't looked at their data for the 3.2, but considering that a lot of the gain for the 2.0T (whichever version) comes from upping the turbo's pressure, an option not available on the NA 3.2, since there's no turbo to manipulate, that would be why there's less of a bump in the numbers.
04-30-2010, 07:50 PM
#13
Audiworld Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Los Gatos,CA
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Guys - Just got my TT flashed today with the full boat Stage 1.
91 $ 93 octane modes are the only two I've tried so far, but the difference is HUGE!! I would not doubt the numbers previously posted.
Running my tank down to fumes so I can put some napalm in.
91 $ 93 octane modes are the only two I've tried so far, but the difference is HUGE!! I would not doubt the numbers previously posted.
Running my tank down to fumes so I can put some napalm in.
05-02-2010, 08:15 AM
#14
AudiWorld Newcomer
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2009 Audi TTS: measured 0-60 4.65 pre tune and 4.30 after stage 1 APR. Stock diverter valve works fine but is a weak link from durability perspective and will eventually fail. The forge is better made and much more durable but I was told by my tuner that the valve is a bit slower, hurting performance. Guess we'll have to wait for a better product . . .
05-03-2010, 06:03 AM
#15
AudiWorld Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What are you driving? 2.0? 3.2? FWD/Quattro?
05-22-2010, 11:40 PM
#17
Audiworld Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Silverdale, WA
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So far I have only run the 91 octane program, and only for daily driving, and ruinning errands around town, and the constant rain here has encouraged me to take it easy.
First impressions were kind of unimpressive. The butt dyno says there is a little more at the top end, and somewhat better than that at the bottom and mid, but nothing mind blowing.
Oddly, I have also noted slightly better fuel mileage, to the tune of about 20 or so extra miles per tank, but that could just be driving in the rain.
05-23-2010, 07:55 AM
#18
AudiWorld Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got my '08 3.2 quattro done a few weeks ago (guessing about 3-400 miles), with the exception of the software the car is stock. I had no error codes. I got the stock, 91,93 and valet programs. I don't expect to spend much time, if any running 100 octane so it seemed pointless.
So far I have only run the 91 octane program, and only for daily driving, and ruinning errands around town, and the constant rain here has encouraged me to take it easy.
First impressions were kind of unimpressive. The butt dyno says there is a little more at the top end, and somewhat better than that at the bottom and mid, but nothing mind blowing.
Oddly, I have also noted slightly better fuel mileage, to the tune of about 20 or so extra miles per tank, but that could just be driving in the rain.
So far I have only run the 91 octane program, and only for daily driving, and ruinning errands around town, and the constant rain here has encouraged me to take it easy.
First impressions were kind of unimpressive. The butt dyno says there is a little more at the top end, and somewhat better than that at the bottom and mid, but nothing mind blowing.
Oddly, I have also noted slightly better fuel mileage, to the tune of about 20 or so extra miles per tank, but that could just be driving in the rain.
05-23-2010, 08:20 PM
#20
AudiWorld Newcomer
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Has anyone ran into problems when taking there car in for service with the APR tune. I am due for my 5000 mile service this week and was wondering if I needed to remove the tune before I take it in.