Quickie 2.0T impressions before I head out for the morning.
#12
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The 3.2 will always be better off the line but a 2.0t with a chip should be marginally quicker than a 3.2 from a roll.
Over 100mph might be a different story though.
Over 100mph might be a different story though.
![Smile](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#14
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have the Mag Ride and 19's so it's fairly planted, but it still is plagued with understeer. I've been tempted to pull the e-brake a bit to get the rear to come around, but good sense on public roads gets the best of me.
Definitely a lot less torque steer and more balance than one would expect from a FWD car with this power:weight ratio.
Definitely a lot less torque steer and more balance than one would expect from a FWD car with this power:weight ratio.
#16
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
<center><img src="http://stasisengineering.com/Images/turbo/power%20graph_final_sm.jpg"></center><p>anyone interested in running a BETA kit for us at a discounted price?
#17
![Default](https://www.audiworld.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
the wheel spin will be far less and should be a good race then. Quaife and chip IMHO equals 2.0T as the winner. And for a fraction of the cost of quattro.