Wheels & Tires Discussion Discussion forum for all questions and topics regarding wheels and tires

Nokian Tire Question: Q, WR, Hakka?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-13-2003, 11:26 AM
  #1  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
KUTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Nokian Tire Question: Q, WR, Hakka?

Still waiting for my M3 Sports to come off backorder, I am beginning to give up hope and look for other tires.
Nokian appears to be the next inline, some would say even better. Living just north of Boston, I will be driving on snow and dry pavement and going skiing in VT and NH on the weekends.
Can someone please tell me the diff. in quality of these tires (these are just models I have collected off of other posts, for all I know some of them may be older models).
I plan on buying something with ratings around that of the M3- H rated, great on dry, great on snow, no studs, same wear, load ratings, etc. THANKS!!!
Old 11-13-2003, 12:37 PM
  #2  
AudiWorld Expert
 
ex-quattro PETE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 27,109
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default I'll narrow it down for ya...

The only H-rated winter (all-weather really) Nokian would be the WR. It may not be as good in the snow as the dedicated winter Nokians (the Hakkas), but it will be much better in the dry, and you could even run it all year long if you wanted to. My guess is the WR would be pretty similar to Dunlop M2/M3 overall.
Old 11-13-2003, 01:44 PM
  #3  
New Member
 
cruise2.7T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LM22 is much better!!
Old 11-13-2003, 02:03 PM
  #4  
Member
 
jprice@CPS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 13,107
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default errmm.. have you driven the same car with both tires?

Just wondering what your point for comparison is.

thanks.
Old 11-13-2003, 02:07 PM
  #5  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
KUTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default jprice, do you have any affiliation w/ Nokian? If not, you should :)

Before a debate starts on the LM22, IIRC, they dont make em in anything around a 205/60/15, so it isnt really something I can consider. Thanks though.
Old 11-13-2003, 02:10 PM
  #6  
AudiWorld Senior Member
 
MurrayA4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Quebec Canada
Posts: 1,846
Received 118 Likes on 100 Posts
Default Have a look here.

When the first "Noreaster"blows through you'll be impressed with these.Yokohama needs to do some marketing.No one seems to know about these fantastic tires.<ul><li><a href="https://www.audiworld.com/reviews/wheels/wheels14.shtml">https://www.audiworld.com/reviews/wheels/wheels14.shtml</a</li></ul>
Old 11-13-2003, 02:21 PM
  #7  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
KUTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So Nokian WR's it is, $113 each installed sound ok?
Old 11-13-2003, 03:46 PM
  #8  
Member
 
jprice@CPS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 13,107
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Haha.. nope.. but you're right, I should! ;-)
Old 11-13-2003, 03:48 PM
  #9  
Member
 
jprice@CPS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 13,107
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Does that include mount and balance? If not, it's a tad high.
Old 11-13-2003, 04:11 PM
  #10  
New Member
Thread Starter
 
KUTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default price includes tire, mount, balance, install, so we are talking 452 total, what do you think?.

should i try to go lower?


Quick Reply: Nokian Tire Question: Q, WR, Hakka?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:30 PM.