Wheels & Tires Discussion Discussion forum for all questions and topics regarding wheels and tires

Nokian WR versus??? Input on winter tire decision

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-08-2006, 02:25 AM
  #11  
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
kraeburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Awesome, I am really happy everything worked out great. you have a sharp looking car!
Old 12-08-2006, 02:26 AM
  #12  
AudiWorld Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
kraeburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks, I will give them a call today
Old 12-08-2006, 07:04 AM
  #13  
AudiWorld Member
 
8Pack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Let me know how you do.....

and what you ultimately decide....I'm curious..
Old 12-14-2006, 10:43 AM
  #14  
New Member
 
S6greytness's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I had a similar decision

I ran Nokian Hakka Q's on my S6, which is not mine any longer. My winter set-up wouldn't fit on my new Passat. I had to move up to a 235 45 17 winter set up as well.

In addition I commute every weekend to Northern VT, for skiing, no exceptions.

In my research there were several options basically dividing between the performance winter tire and the winter friction tire. The NRW was an early version of the performance winter tire, but many other tires have passed the NRW in the past few years for it's winter performance. ADAC, the German automobile association did an extensive test of these type of tires a year or so ago. They rated the wet dry and snow performance. The run-away winner was the Conti-Winter TS810. Here is the link to the summary.

http://www.adac.de/Tests/Reifentests/Winterreifen/205-55-R16-HT-2004-10/tab.asp?ComponentID=94934&SourcePageID=94888

Now, the other option is the pure friction tire, more of the pure snow tire. It has less dry performance, but optimizes the snow and ice grip. In this case the tires are actually a bit more reasonable price wise. The latest from Nokian is the Hakka RSi. I was predisposed to get that tire, As I had nokian previously and they were excellent. The best I could find in in the 235 45 17 for $200 a tire. I was tempted. Then I found this reference.

http://www.consumersearch.com/www/automotive/snow-tires/reviews.html

The Scandinavian magazine rated the Michelin X-Ice the equivalent of the RSi. It turns out that the X-Ice is new in the 235-45-17. Michelin has always had the Pilot Alpin in that size, but it has always been weak in the snow tests. In any case the X-Ice is available for $127 from the Tirerack.

So my decision came down to the ContiTS810 or the Michelin X-Ice. I went for the better snow performance of the Michelin and $40 less a tire. I'm using the extra cash for an extra set of TPMS sensors. So good luck and I hope the references help.
Old 12-14-2006, 11:34 PM
  #15  
Member
 
jprice@CPS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 13,107
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default FYI I've had both the RSi (last winter) and X Ice (this winter)

The X-Ice is not as good as the RSi in the slippery stuff, but the X-Ice is a little bit better behaved on the dry pavement.
Old 12-17-2006, 03:29 PM
  #16  
New Member
 
S6greytness's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: FYI I've had both the RSi (last winter) and X Ice (this winter)

Any more details? When you say slippery, deep snow or packed? Did you have both on the same car?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
soljc
Wheels & Tires Discussion
2
09-24-2004 07:58 AM
Tbandido
Wheels & Tires Discussion
7
12-02-2003 08:16 AM
unA4dable
Wheels & Tires Discussion
1
12-15-2000 12:49 PM
O0 Ia
Wheels & Tires Discussion
8
10-03-2000 07:52 PM



Quick Reply: Nokian WR versus??? Input on winter tire decision



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:24 AM.